The inherent irony of affirmative action

affirmative action success statistics

Since Grutter was a decision, it may not take much to swing the Court in the opposite direction. If this student instead enrolls at Princeton, however, his SAT scores will put him points below the 25th percentile for that school, likely making his academic standing very tenuous.

Insofar as familial relation usually given low rates of interracial marriage correlates very strongly with race, nepotism has been a tough antidiscrimination issue.

affirmative action statistics 2017

Color blind approaches to employment were embedded in American constitutional theory at least after the Civil War and did not spring up in opposition to affirmative action.

This past year, a wave of conservative protests from Asian American communities have surfaced.

Affirmative action statistics 2018

Those who wanted the federal government to go beyond equal treatment and ensure proportionalism were uniformly disappointed in Title VII. Even using flawed methodology, however, it is difficult to avoid the evidence of affirmative action's failure. The strong constitutional presumption against race discrimination in all its forms, which must be firm and unchanging to be effective, was laid aside for no good reason. The increased earnings the Penn State student gets from high grades are worth almost twice the increased earnings from attending Princeton. One wonders why the other members are not identified as Protestant or Catholic. These authors also dispelled the common belief that affirmative action beneficiaries "catch up" after their freshman years with their better-credentialed fellow students. Indeed, as early as , University of Chicago sociologist James Davis published research demonstrating that a student who attends a school that is out of his academic league is often put at a professional disadvantage. Harvard, a case originally filed in and brought to Boston Federal District Court this past October, by arguing for the minority Asian Americans with the same reasons that have historically been used against minorities, has exposed looming contentions between minority groups in the US. By arguing that Harvard ban race-based admissions, Asians—specifically 1st generation east-Asians fighting for the future of elite education for their children most of whom are US citizens —ironically drive themselves into a dead-end, and perpetuate their already monolithic appearance within broader white US culture. Gail Heriot Winter In , the Supreme Court held that the University of Michigan's law school could substantially relax its admissions standards in order to admit a "critical mass" of African-American and Hispanic students. When African-American and white law students with similar entering credentials competed against one another, they performed very close to the same.

An aspiring science or engineering major who attends a school where his entering academic credentials put him in the middle or the top of his class is more likely to persevere, and ultimately to succeed, than an otherwise identical student attending a more elite school where those same credentials place him nearer to the bottom of his class.

Their book calculated that even black men with combined SAT scores of less than — low for elite schools — who attend top-tier schools like Princeton out-earn similarly credentialed students who attend schools like Pennsylvania State.

At the same time, the riots also posed a threat to the legitimacy of mainstream civil rights leadership.

The inherent irony of affirmative action

Posted by Reid Hansen Mar 22, ConstitutionRacism 0 The richest quality that the United States should take pride in is the diversity of our people.

Rated 8/10 based on 33 review
The Ironies of Affirmative Action: Politics, Culture and Justice in America