Integrated literature review research methods
Meta-analysis is associated with deductive research approach. Integrative reviews of nursing research.
Integrative review level of evidence
Systematic Reviews specifically include experimental research studies search and selection methodology is very precise and should be explicitly described well enough for another researcher to duplicate the searches and the study selection. This technique integrates, evaluates and interprets findings of multiple qualitative research studies. The clinical experience of the researcher contributes to check validity of the methods and results, and helps determining their usefulness in practice 1 , 9. Nonetheless, to protect validity of the integrative review, the investigators must stress their conclusions and inferences, and also explain the biases 9. Meta-synthesis literature review is conducted usually when following inductive research approach. Russel CL. Hence, scarcity of published scientific articles on integrative review was observed, since it is a methodology derived from Evidence-based Practice, which is increasingly developing in nursing, as well as in all other areas in the field of health. Next, data are extracted from the primary sources using the prepared instrument to simplify, summarize and organize the findings, so that each study is reduced to one page with relevant content Appendix 1. It determines integrative review, presents its purposes and describes its phases. Your choice of a specific type of literature review should be based upon your research area, research problem and research methods. Reducing data involves determining the general classification system to manage diverse methodologies. The following step is the visualization of data, that is, converting the findings into a visual form of subgroups. Whittemore R. Integrative literature review reviews, critiques, and synthesizes secondary data about research topic in an integrated way such that new frameworks and perspectives on the topic are generated. Porto Alegre RS : Artmed,
To assist in choosing the best possible evidence, a hierarchy of evidence is proposed, based on the design of the research, which is one of the items to be analyzed in this phase 7. The data should include definition of the subjects, methodology, size of the sample, measuring variables, method of analysis and concepts used as bases is the Appendix 1 is a model of an instrument to be used in data collection 89.
It consists of reduction, presentation and comparison of data, as well as conclusion and verification of data. Narrative review also draws conclusions about the topic and identifies gaps or inconsistencies in a body of knowledge.
Integrative review hierarchy of evidence
This will retrieve literature reviews, systematic reviews, and integrative reviews. The clinical experience of the researcher contributes to check validity of the methods and results, and helps determining their usefulness in practice 1 , 9. Res Nurs Health. For this reason, it is imperative to establish integrative review as a valid instrument of Evidence-based Practice, primarily in the current scenario of Brazilian nursing. Systematic literature review requires more rigorous and well-defined approach compared to most other types of literature review. Meta-Analysis is an option under Publication Type. Reducing data involves determining the general classification system to manage diverse methodologies. In addition to identifying eventual gaps in knowledge, it is possible to set priorities for future studies. It should contain relevant and detailed pieces of information based on contextualized methodologies, without omission of any related evidence 1 , 9. It should be clearly and specifically prepared, and related to a theoretical principle that comprises theories and rationale learned by the researcher 1 , 9. The following step is the visualization of data, that is, converting the findings into a visual form of subgroups. In integrative review, the combination of several methodologies may contribute to lack of rigor, inaccuracy and bias; thus, it should be conducted within the methodological rigor standards 3. Meta-synthesis, on the other hand, is based on non-statistical techniques.
Whittemore R, Kanafl K. It distinguishes integrative review from other review methods and presents strategies to increase methodological rigor in this type of methodology. Next, the six phases of the process of preparing an integrative review are briefly presented 8.
Porto Alegre RS : Artmed, Reducing data involves determining the general classification system to manage diverse methodologies.
Integrated literature review research methods
Argumentative literature review, as the name implies, examines literature selectively in order to support or refute an argument, deeply imbedded assumption, or philosophical problem already established in the literature. Indexing, abstracts, and full-text from nursing and allied health journals. It displays the benefts of integrative review and describes its phases. Reducing data involves determining the general classification system to manage diverse methodologies. Use instead of PubMed. No additional experimental work is done usually. Res Nurs Health. Level 4: evidence of descriptive non-experimental studies or with a qualitative approach; —. The EBM Evidence Based Medicine Reviews check box will retrieve mostly systematic reviews from Cochrane Reviews which may have to be searched for separately within our Cochrane subscription. Reviews will also appear in the results when using the Research check box -- look in the text immediately following the article title for a indication of what type of article it is, Research, Systematic Review, etc. It analyzes, synthesizes and differentiates all the review methods, including integrative review. In addition to identifying eventual gaps in knowledge, it is possible to set priorities for future studies.
Level 3: evidence from quasi-experimental studies; —. It displays the benefts of integrative review and describes its phases.
based on 6 review